Locked intramedullary nailing versus dynamic compression plating for humeral shaft fractures.

PURPOSE. To compare functional outcomes, union and complication rates in patients treated with locked intramedullary nailing or dynamic compression plating for humeral shaft fractures. METHODS. 32 men and 2 women with humeral shaft fractures were randomised to undergo locked antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN, n=16) or dynamic compression plating (DCP, n=18). Patients with pathological fractures, grade-III open fractures, neurovascular injury, or fractures for more than 2 weeks were excluded. Fractures were classified according to the AO classification system (one in A1, 6 in A2, 12 in A3, 6 in B1, and 9 in B2). 28 were injured in road traffic accidents. The functional outcome (according to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score) and rates of union and complication of the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months. In the respective IMN and DCP groups, the mean ASES scores were 45.2 and 45.1 (p=0.69), the complication rates were 50% and 17% (p=0.038), and the non-union rates were 0% and 6% (p=0.15). In the IMN group, 2 sustained iatrogenic fractures during nail insertion; 2 had transient radial nerve palsies; one underwent nail removal for shoulder impingement; and 3 had adhesive capsulitis. In the DCP group, one underwent re-operation for implant failure; one had a superficial infection; and one developed adhesive capsulitis. CONCLUSION. The complication rate was higher in the IMN group, whereas functional outcomes were good with both modalities.